In the graphs of C (capacitance) against A (area) & C (capacitance) against 1/d (1/ distance between plates of capacitor), the experimental straight line obtained is higher than the theoretical one & it does not pass through the origin. Should the theoretical line have the same slope as the expt one? Is there any prove?
If the dielectric is introduced while the voltage across the capacitor is held constant, by a battery for example, the amount of charge stored on the capacitor will increase until the Et increases to the value that Ea had in the absence of the dielectric. In other words, the reduction in field due to Ei causes the voltage across the capacitor to momentarily decrease until current flowing from the battery restores the original voltage. This current piles up on the plates as additional charge.
It is not clear to me from your question exactly what experimental data was plotted. In general when you find a difference between theoretical and experimental results you should examine carefully any assumptions implicit in the theoretical model. For example do you neglect the finite size of your capacitor so that the effects occurring at the boundaries of your real apparatus are not duplicated in the theory. Or perhaps do you use the free space value of permittivity when your apparatus has air between the plates. Or maybe your dielectric material has some minute leakage current through it. Assuming that your measurements are carefully made, the problem is always in the theory, usually in some sort of over simplification.
This information is brought to you by M. Casco Associates, a company dedicated to helping humankind reach the stars through understanding how the universe works. My name is James D. Jones. If I can be of more help, please let me know.
JDJ